Keepnet Labs Logo
Keepnet Labs > whitepapers > the-impact-of-manual-operations-in-pentesting-and-the-shift-towards-automation

The Impact of Manual Operations in Pentesting and the Shift Towards Automation

At the forefront of security defense mechanisms is 'Pentesting' or 'Penetration Testing.' This practice, deeply embedded in the cybersecurity fabric, is a proactive approach for organizations to identify vulnerabilities in their systems before malicious entities do.

Partnership with Pentesters Whitepaper

I. Introduction

At the forefront of security defense mechanisms is 'Pentesting' or 'Penetration Testing.' This practice, deeply embedded in the cybersecurity fabric, is a proactive approach for organizations to identify vulnerabilities in their systems before malicious entities do.

The essence of pentesting lies in its methodology. It simulates cyber-attacks on systems, networks, and applications, mimicking the strategies of potential hackers. By doing so, it offers organizations a clear lens to view possible chinks in their armor, allowing them to fortify their defenses proactively. As the digital landscape expands, so does the complexity and sophistication of cyber threats. From ransomware attacks that can cripple global supply chains to stealthy phishing campaigns targeting unsuspecting individuals, threats are vast and continually evolving. This evolution of cyber threats necessitates a dynamic approach to cybersecurity. Static defenses, no matter how robust, are no longer sufficient. The need of the hour is continuous assessment and adaptation, where pentesting plays a pivotal role. It ensures that organizations are not just reacting to threats but are always a step ahead, preparing for them.

The urgency for such proactive measures becomes even more palpable when considering the financial implications of cyber threats. A staggering projection from Cybersecurity Ventures estimated that annual damages from cybercrime will reach $10.5 trillion by 2025. This figure isn't just a testament to these attacks' frequency and devastating impact. Beyond the immediate financial losses, cyber-attacks can erode consumer trust, tarnish brand reputation, and lead to regulatory repercussions.

However, the $6 trillion isn't just a number; it's a wake-up call. It underscores the dire need for robust, proactive security measures. Organizations can no longer afford a reactive stance, waiting for breaches to occur and then taking action. The stakes are too high. In this context, pentesting emerges as a critical necessity, not just a best practice. It embodies the adage, "It's better to be safe than sorry."

This whitepaper is crafted for cybersecurity professionals, IT decision-makers, and organizations keen on understanding the balance between manual and automated pentesting. We will delve into the challenges, shedding light on potential drawbacks. Moreover, we'll explore how modern solutions, like those offered by Keepnet Labs, are revolutionizing the pentesting domain by integrating the strengths of both manual expertise and automation.

By the end of this whitepaper, readers will gain a comprehensive understanding of the current pentesting landscape, the transformative power of automation, and how to employ a hybrid approach for optimal cybersecurity outcomes strategically.

2. The Era of Manual Pentesting

In the nascent stages of the digital age, the need to secure these systems became evident as computers began to find their way into businesses and homes, the need to secure these systems became evident. This period marked the birth of penetration testing, or pentesting, as we know it. Initially, pentesting was a manual endeavor, driven by curious minds who sought to understand system vulnerabilities and find ways to exploit or fix them.

A. Key Components of Manual Pentesting Operations

Manual pentesting in its early days was characterized by several distinct components:

  1. Reconnaissance: This initial phase involved gathering as much information as possible about the target system, often through public sources.
  2. Scanning: Pentesters would manually identify open ports and services running on target systems.
  3. Gaining Access: Using the information gathered, pentesters would attempt to exploit known vulnerabilities in the system.
  4. Maintaining Access: The goal here was to create a backdoor for themselves, understanding how malware can remain in the system undetected.
  5. Analysis: After the test, pentesters manually compile detailed reports outlining vulnerabilities discovered, data accessed, and recommendations for securing the system.

B. Challenges and Limitations of Manual Social Engineering Pentesting

The art of manual pentesting, deeply rooted in human expertise and intuition, has long been the gold standard in cybersecurity assessments. While its merits are undeniable, it's essential to recognize this traditional approach's inherent challenges and limitations.

  1. Time-Consuming: One of the most significant challenges of manual pentesting is the time it demands. With the ever-growing complexity of IT infrastructures, manually probing each component for vulnerabilities becomes a Herculean task. A telling survey by Cybersecurity Insiders highlighted this concern, revealing that a substantial 65% of cybersecurity professionals felt constrained by time, believing there simply weren't enough hours in the day to address all vulnerabilities through manual means comprehensively. This time constraint can expose organizations to potential breaches as cyber threats evolve quickly.
  2. Stress and Burnout: The meticulous nature of manual pentesting and its time-intensive demands can take a toll on pentesters. The responsibility of safeguarding an organization's digital assets is immense, and the pressure to identify every potential vulnerability can lead to pentester fatigue. This burnout not only affects the well-being of the professionals but can also reduce the efficiency and effectiveness of vulnerability detection, potentially leaving gaps in the security assessment.
  3. Financial Implications: Quality comes at a cost. Employing skilled pentesters to probe systems manually is a significant investment. Given the labor-intensive nature of manual pentesting, the financial implications can be substantial, especially for prolonged or recurrent assessments. This cost can be a deterrent for startups or smaller organizations with limited cybersecurity budgets, and this cost can be a deterrent, leading them to opt for less comprehensive security evaluations.
  4. Human Error: While being one of the strengths of manual pentesting, the human element is also its Achilles' heel. No matter the level of expertise or experience, humans are fallible. They can overlook vulnerabilities, misinterpret data, or make errors in judgment. No matter how minor, a single oversight can be a potential entry point for malicious entities. Moreover, personal biases or preconceived notions can sometimes cloud judgment, leading to gaps in the assessment.
  5. False Positives: In the aftermath of simulation exercises, pentesters are tasked with compiling in-depth reports. This involves sifting through the data to weed out false positives and thoroughly analyzing the findings. Such a detailed and manual process can significantly prolong the project's duration, adding to the overall time and effort required.
  6. Delivery Issues: One of the notable challenges during social engineering tests is ensuring that emails effectively land in the intended recipient's inbox. With the presence of deceptive links and attachments, these emails are frequently intercepted and blocked by servers. Pentesters, therefore, have to expend significant effort and devise strategies to navigate these obstacles and ensure successful email delivery.

While manual pentesting offers unparalleled depth and insight, organizations must know its challenges. Recognizing these limitations allows for better planning, resource allocation, and, if necessary, integrating automated tools to complement and enhance the manual assessment process.

Social engineering simulations are pivotal in assessing an organization's vulnerability to deceptive email attacks. These simulations mimic real-world phishing attempts, aiming to train and test employees' ability to recognize and respond to malicious threats. The table below provides a comprehensive overview of the steps involved in conducting a phishing simulation, detailing the actions taken by pentesters, the challenges they face, and the estimated effort required for each step. This breakdown offers a glimpse into the meticulous planning and execution needed to ensure the effectiveness of these simulations.

Table 1. Social Engineering Simulation Process: Steps, Actions, and Challenges for Pentesters

StepsDescriptionWhat Pentester DoesChallengesEffort (man/hour)
Buy a new domainPhishing simulation needs a domain and subdomains related to the type of phishing scenario.Pentester buys the domain each time.Setting up name servers. Configure domain proxy for privacy. For the different campaigns, the pentester needs other subdomains. Pentest teams have too many pentesters, and all are not authorized to do this action.2 hours
Email serverFor the delivery of phishing simulation emails, the pentester needs email servers.Mostly, pentesters have email servers like Postfix, Qmail, Exim, etc.Not every pentester is an expert in creating an email server, and configuring it for different domains. The pentest team also has the challenge of getting blocked by secure email gateways and internet service providers. Pentester needs to handle bounce messages, and the queue of emails manually.50 hours annually + $1000
Set up SPF, MX, DMARC, DKIMSPF, MX, DMARC, and DKIM are all necessary email authentication protocols.Pentesters should configure SPF, MX, DMARC, and DKIM for better email delivery.Pentesters needs help with all these configurations; they either spend their own time if they’re expert about this or get support from an IT company. When new domains should be registered, all these processes start from scratch.20 hours + $2500 annually
Set up an SSL certificateSimulation domain should have a valid SSL certificate.Pentester buys an SSL certificate.Challenge to buy a valid SSL certificate for newly registered phishing domains. Avoid getting blocked by ISPs and security solutions.2-3 hours
Create a new email template.Phishing emails come in various forms.Pentesters design an email template and landing pages.Pentesters see this as a waste of time.2-8 hours
Create a new landing pageWhen a user clicks on a link in a phishing test, they are redirected to a fake landing page.Pentester designs a landing page for different purposes.Many modern security solutions block these pages.4-10 hours
Create a new attachmentWhen a user clicks on an attachment in a phishing test, the file can contain a link or prompt the user to enable macros.--4-10 hours
Upload target userUsers that will be tested need to be uploaded into the system.--1-2 hours
Test phishing campaignTesting is crucial to evaluate whether phishing templates work.-If phishing templates are not working correctly, edits and improvements are needed.1-4 hours
Track reportPentest should track various metrics.Pentest uses some internal tools or open-source solutions.There are many metrics that customers demand after a phishing simulation.10-15 hours
Share ReportNeed to share the result with the customer.Pentester shares result in the pentest report.Pentester cannot create customized reports for customer requirements.1-2 hours
Delivery issuesPhishing emails are mostly delivered by email to organization inboxes.Pentester has email delivery options only.MHard to bypass all security solutions and avoid false clicks.2-6 hours

This table provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges faced by pentesters during phishing simulations.

3. The Rise of Automation in Pentesting

The world of pentesting, like many other sectors, has not remained untouched by the wave of technological advancements. As the digital landscape grew in complexity, the tools and techniques used to safeguard it needed to evolve. Enter the era of automated pentesting, a paradigm shift driven by the need for efficiency, scalability, and precision.

A. Technological Advancements Driving the Shift

The last decade has witnessed a surge in technological innovations. Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and advanced algorithms have paved the way for tools to simulate sophisticated cyber-attacks, analyze vast networks quickly, and identify vulnerabilities with pinpoint accuracy. These technologies have enabled automating tasks that previously required manual intervention, such as vulnerability scanning, data analysis, and even some aspects of threat modeling.

Moreover, the rise of cloud computing has facilitated the development and deployment of scalable pentesting tools. These tools can be updated in real time, ensuring they can identify the latest vulnerabilities and employ the most recent attack vectors.

B. Benefits of Integrating Automation into Pentesting Operations

  1. Efficiency and Speed: Automated tools can scan large networks or applications in a fraction of the time it would take a manual pentester. This rapid assessment means vulnerabilities can be identified and addressed more promptly, reducing the window of opportunity for malicious actors.
  2. Consistency: While human pentesters might approach tasks differently each time, automated tools ensure a consistent methodology, ensuring that every component is tested under the same conditions during each assessment.
  3. Scalability: Automated solutions can quickly adapt to the size of the target environment, whether it's a small business network or a global enterprise infrastructure. This scalability ensures that their pentesting solutions can grow with them as organizations grow.
  4. Comprehensive Reporting: Automated tools generate detailed reports, highlighting vulnerabilities and their potential impact and often suggesting remediation measures. These reports are faster to produce and free from human error.
  5. Cost-Effectiveness: While there's an initial investment in automated tools, they can lead to significant cost savings in the long run. Reduced time on projects means fewer billable hours and faster vulnerability detection can prevent costly breaches.
  6. Continuous Monitoring: Some advanced automated tools offer continuous monitoring, providing real-time insights into an organization's security posture and immediate alerts if a vulnerability is detected.

4. Key Components of Automated Social Engineering Pentesting

The importance of robust pentesting mechanisms cannot be overstated. With the increasing sophistication of cyber threats, especially in social engineering, automated pentesting has emerged as a critical countermeasure. Here, we'll explore the pivotal components that are shaping the future of automated social engineering pentesting.

A. Products Leading the Charge

  1. Phishing Simulation Platforms: These platforms replicate real-world phishing attacks, allowing organizations to assess employees' responses to deceptive emails. Automated systems can conduct regular tests, ensuring continuous vigilance against such threats.
  2. MFA Phishing Platforms: Multi-factor authentication (MFA) has become a standard security measure. However, attackers are now mimicking MFA prompts to deceive users. Automated MFA phishing platforms simulate these deceptive tactics, training users to recognize and avoid them.
  3. Vishing (Voice Phishing) Tools: These tools simulate voice phishing attacks, training employees to be cautious of malicious callers. Automated systems can generate diverse scenarios, ensuring a comprehensive defense strategy.
  4. Comprehensive Reporting: Automated tools generate detailed reports, highlighting vulnerabilities and their potential impact and often suggesting remediation measures. These reports are faster to produce and free from human error.
  5. Quishing Platforms: Quick Response (QR) code phishing, or quishing, is a newer threat where malicious QR codes are used to deceive users. Automated platforms can simulate these attacks, educating users about the potential risks of scanning unknown QR codes.
  6. Smishing (SMS Phishing) Platforms: Automated tools can send simulated malicious SMS messages, training users to recognize and avoid such threats in an era dominated by mobile device usage.
  7. Password Phishing Platforms: These platforms simulate attacks to steal user passwords. By exposing users to such simulations, they become better equipped to recognize and avoid genuine password phishing attempts
  8. Ransomware Phishing Platforms: Given the rise of ransomware attacks globally, these platforms simulate ransomware delivery mechanisms, typically through deceptive links or email attachments. This trains users to be wary of potential ransomware delivery vectors.
  9. Automated Pretexting Systems: These systems simulate pretexting attacks, where attackers fabricate scenarios to extract information, ensuring users are prepared for such deceptive tactics.

B. The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Modern Pentesting

  1. Adaptive Testing: ML algorithms analyze past test results, adapting future simulations for targeted training.
  2. Real-time Feedback Loop: As users interact with these AI-driven social engineering attempts, the system can provide real-time feedback to pentesters. This allows them to understand which tactics are most effective and which areas require further refinement.
  3. Natural Language Processing (NLP): AI systems with NLP craft more believable phishing emails, enhancing the realism of simulations.
  4. Behavioral Analysis Integration: By integrating with behavioral analysis tools, AI can determine the best time to launch a specific type of attack. For example, sending a phishing email when a user is most likely distracted or launching a vishing attack when they're likely to be busy.
  5. Deep-Fake Voice Phishing: Advanced AI algorithms can now accurately mimic human voices, making voice phishing attacks more convincing. This adds complexity to pentesting, requiring new methods to detect and defend against such sophisticated threats.
  6. Interactive Scenarios: AI can create dynamic, interactive social engineering scenarios that evolve based on the user's responses, ensuring that training remains challenging and effective.
  7. Simulated Insider Threats: Using AI, pentesters can simulate insider threats, where the AI mimics the behavior of a disgruntled employee or someone with inside knowledge, testing an organization's defense against such nuanced threats.
  8. Phishing Simulation: AI can craft highly convincing phishing emails by analyzing an individual's communication style, preferences, and habits. It can also adjust the phishing content in real time based on the user's interaction, making the deception more believable.
  9. Smishing (SMS Phishing): AI can automate the process of sending deceptive text messages to many users. The AI can refine its approach by analyzing user responses, ensuring higher success rates in subsequent attempts.
  10. Quishing (QR Code Phishing): AI can generate malicious QR codes tailored to individual preferences or popular trends. By analyzing which QR codes are scanned more frequently, the AI can optimize the design and payload of these codes to increase their effectiveness.
  11. Vishing (Voice Phishing): Advanced AI algorithms can mimic voices, accents, and speech patterns to make vishing attacks more convincing. They can also adapt their approach in real-time based on the conversation, ensuring a higher likelihood of deceiving the target.
  12. MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) Phishing: AI can craft deceptive prompts or messages that mimic legitimate MFA requests. The AI can refine its approach by analyzing which methods are more effective in deceiving users, making it harder for users to distinguish between genuine MFA prompts and malicious ones.
  13. Adaptive Content Generation: For all the above methods, AI can generate content (emails, SMS, voice scripts) that evolves based on user interaction. For instance, if a user doesn't click on a link in a phishing email, the AI can adjust the content, design, or approach for the next attempt, learning from each interaction to improve its success rate.
  14. Trend Analysis: AI can analyze global and regional trends to predict the next big theme for phishing campaigns. For instance, during a global event or crisis, the AI can craft relevant phishing content that aligns with current events, making the deception more timely and believable.
  15. Automated A/B Testing: AI can run multiple phishing, smishing, or vishing campaigns simultaneously, determining which version is most effective in real-time and adjusting its approach accordingly.

C. Integration of Automated Systems into Existing Cybersecurity Frameworks

  1. Seamless Integration with SIEM Systems: Integrating pentesting tools with SIEM systems ensures comprehensive data analysis.
  2. API-Driven Automation: Robust APIs allow seamless integration with other cybersecurity tools, providing a unified security overview.
  3. Continuous Monitoring and Feedback Loops: Automated systems provide continuous monitoring, ensuring immediate vulnerability flagging and mitigation.
  4. Customization and Scalability: Automated tools offer unmatched flexibility tailored to an organization's unique needs.
  5. Training and Awareness Integration: Integrated training modules ensure immediate learning upon falling for a simulated attack.

Incorporating these advanced tools and platforms into pentesting operations ensures a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to cybersecurity. As cyber threats continue to evolve, so must our defense methods. Automated social engineering pentesting, with its diverse toolset and AI-driven capabilities, stands at the forefront of this evolution, promising a safer digital future for all.

5. Benefits of the Shift Towards Automation

The cybersecurity landscape is constantly in flux, with threats evolving at an unprecedented rate. The shift towards automation in pentesting has emerged as a game-changer in this dynamic environment. By integrating automated tools and methodologies, pentesters can address the challenges of the modern digital world more effectively. Let's delve into the manifold benefits of this transformative shift.

A. Enhanced Accuracy and Reduced Human Error

  1. Precision in Testing: Automated systems, devoid of human biases and fatigue, execute tests meticulously. This ensures that every potential vulnerability is probed, leaving no stone unturned.
  2. Consistency: Unlike manual testing, where results can vary based on the tester's expertise and state of mind, automated tests ensure uniformity. The same test can be replicated multiple times, producing consistent results.
  3. Objective Analysis: Automated tools provide objective, data-driven insights. There's no room for subjective interpretation, ensuring vulnerabilities are assessed based on factual data.
  4. Mitigation of Oversights: Human testers might overlook specific vulnerabilities for many reasons, from simple oversight to lack of expertise in a specific area. Automated systems, on the other hand, are comprehensive in their approach, reducing the chances of missed threats.
  5. No False Positives: No false clicks on reporting as automation detects and eliminates automated security tools clicks on simulated phishing campaigns!
  6. No Delivery Issues: Using automated platforms, pentesters don’t have to configure email servers to ensure they are not blocked during the social engineering test. No whitelisting is needed.

B. Time and Cost Savings

  1. Speed of Execution: Automated pentesting tools can scan vast networks in a fraction of the time it would take a human tester. This rapid execution allows for more frequent testing, ensuring up-to-date security assessments.
  2. Resource Optimization: Human resources can be redirected towards more complex, higher-value tasks by automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks. This not only optimizes the use of skilled labor but also ensures that their expertise is utilized where it's most needed.
  3. Financial Efficiency: Automation can lead to significant cost savings in the long run. While there's an initial investment in acquiring and setting up automated tools, the subsequent reduction in man-hours and increased testing frequency ensures a favorable return on investment.
  4. Immediate Reporting: Automated systems generate instant reports post-testing. This eliminates the waiting period associated with manual testing, where reports are often compiled and presented days or weeks after the test.
  5. Ready-to-use social engineering templates: Automated pentesting tools often come equipped with a library of pre-designed social engineering templates, streamlining the process of launching simulated attacks. These templates offer several advantages:
    1. Diverse Scenarios: These templates cover a wide range of social engineering tactics, from classic phishing emails to more sophisticated vishing or smishing attempts. This ensures a comprehensive testing environment that mimics real-world threats.
    2. Customization: While they are ready-to-use, many templates offer customization options. Pentesters can tweak the content, design, or approach to align with an organization's specific characteristics or vulnerabilities.
    3. Up-to-date Threats: The library of templates is regularly updated to reflect cybercriminals' latest tactics and techniques. This ensures that organizations are always tested against the most recent threats.
    4. Consistency: Using standardized templates ensures consistency across multiple tests. This allows organizations to measure improvements or regressions in their cybersecurity posture over time.
    5. Localized Content: Many templates come with localization options, allowing pentesters to craft messages in various languages, ensuring relevance for global organizations with diverse employee bases.
    6. Metrics and Analytics: These templates often have built-in metrics tracking user interaction. This provides valuable data on how employees respond to threats, helping organizations tailor their training programs.
    7. Quick Deployment: With ready-to-use templates, pentesters can quickly launch a wide range of simulated attacks without extensive preparation. This is especially useful for impromptu tests or when responding to emerging threats.
    8. Educational Components: Some templates include educational feedback. If an employee falls for a simulated attack, they can immediately receive information on what they did wrong and how to avoid such threats in the future.

C. Scalability: Catering to Projects of All Sizes

  1. Adaptable Frameworks: Automated tools can be easily scaled up or down based on the project's requirements. Automated systems can adapt seamlessly, whether a small business network or a global enterprise infrastructure.
  2. Parallel Testing: Automation allows concurrent testing across different network parts or even multiple networks. This is particularly beneficial for organizations with vast and diverse digital infrastructures.
  3. Customizable Modules: Automated pentesting tools often come with modular structures. Organizations can choose specific modules based on their needs, ensuring tailored testing that aligns with their unique digital landscape.

D. Continuous Monitoring and Real-Time Threat Detection

  1. 24 / 7 Vigilance: Unlike human testers, automated systems can monitor networks round the clock. This continuous vigilance ensures that threats are detected quickly, allowing immediate mitigation.
  2. Proactive Threat Detection: Advanced automated systems, especially those integrated with AI and machine learning, can predict potential vulnerabilities based on emerging global cyber threat trends. This proactive approach ensures that organizations are prepared even for zero-day vulnerabilities.
  3. Instant Alerts: In case of a security breach or suspicious activity, automated systems send instant alerts. This ensures that security teams can act without delay, minimizing potential damage.
  4. Historical Data Analysis: Automated tools store historical data, allowing for retrospective analysis. This can be invaluable in understanding past vulnerabilities, learning from them, and fortifying defenses for the future.

The shift towards automation in pentesting is not just a trend but a necessity in today's cyber-centric world. From enhanced accuracy to significant cost savings, the manifold benefits make a compelling case for organizations to embrace this change. As cyber threats continue to grow in complexity, automation ensures that defenses remain robust, agile, and one step ahead. The future of pentesting is automated, and the future is now.

6. Conclusion

The journey from manual to automated pentesting is emblematic of the broader evolution in the cybersecurity domain. As we've traversed this whitepaper, we've witnessed the historical roots of pentesting, understood the challenges of manual operations, and marveled at the transformative power of automation. Let's recap this transformative journey and understand its implications for the future.

A. From Manual Mastery to Automated Agility

Pentesting, in its complex stages, was a craft honed by experts who manually probed systems, seeking vulnerabilities. This manual approach, while effective in its time, had its limitations. Time constraints, financial implications, scalability issues, and the ever-looming shadow of a human error made it clear that a change was needed. Enter automation. With the advent of sophisticated tools and technologies, the pentesting process underwent a paradigm shift. Tasks that once took days were executed in minutes, and the accuracy and consistency of tests improved dramatically.

B. The Imperative Need for Continuous Adaptation

The cyber realm is dynamic. Threat actors are continuously innovating, devising new methods to breach defenses. In such a scenario, resting on one's laurels is not an option. The shift from manual to automated pentesting is just one step in the journey. As technologies like AI and machine learning become more advanced and as cyber threats grow in complexity, the pentesting domain must continue to evolve.

Automation in pentesting is not just about speed and efficiency; it's about staying relevant. As cyber threats become more sophisticated, the tools to combat them must be equally, if not more, advanced. Integrating AI, machine learning, and other cutting-edge technologies into pentesting tools ensure that defenses are reactive and proactive.

C. Partnering with Keepnet Labs: A Strategic Move

The right partnership can be the difference between staying ahead or falling behind. Keepnet Labs emerges as a vanguard in the automated pentesting arena, offering a blend of innovation, efficiency, and foresight. Here's why partnering with Keepnet Labs is the strategic move every pentester should consider:

  1. State-of-the-Art Tools: Keepnet Labs boasts a comprehensive suite of products addressing a spectrum of pentesting challenges. Whether it's MFA phishing platforms, ransomware phishing platforms, or quishing platforms, they've got you covered.
  2. Unparalleled Efficiency: Time is of the essence in pentesting. Keepnet Labs' products are designed to slash the traditional 3-day pentesting process, reducing it to 20 minutes and translating to significant time and cost savings.
  3. Unwavering Commitment to Privacy: Data protection is paramount in today's digital age. Keepnet Labs doesn't just prioritize it; they champion it. Their commitment to privacy and legal compliance ensures that sensitive data remains sacrosanct during tests.
  4. Future-Ready Innovations: The cybersecurity landscape is in perpetual flux. Keepnet Labs doesn't just respond to these changes; they anticipate them. Their focus on continuous innovation ensures that partners are always equipped with the latest and most effective products.
  5. Tailored Solutions: Recognizing that every pentester has unique needs, Keepnet Labs offers customizable solutions, ensuring partners have the right tools for every challenge.
  6. Global Reach with a Personal Touch: Catering to a global clientele, Keepnet Labs combines the expertise of a global leader with the personalized touch of a dedicated partner.

The transition from manual to automated pentesting marks a significant milestone. It underscores the industry's commitment to innovation, efficiency, and excellence. As we reflect on this journey and envision the road ahead, one truth resonates: the future of pentesting is not just automated; it's also collaborative. And in this collaborative future, strategic partnerships, especially ones like that with Keepnet Labs, will be the cornerstones of success.

D. Take the Leap – Request a Demo Today!

Experience the future of pentesting. Discover how Keepnet Labs can revolutionize your operations, enhance your offerings, and elevate your standing in the cybersecurity domain. Don't just be a part of the future; shape it with Keepnet Labs. Apply for the partnership to witness the transformation firsthand.



Schedule your 30-minute demo now

You'll learn how to:
tickAutomate behaviour-based security awareness training for employees to identify and report threats: phishing, vishing, smishing, quishing, MFA phishing, callback phishing!
tickAutomate phishing analysis by 187x and remove threats from inboxes 48x faster.
tickUse our AI-driven human-centric platform with Autopilot and Self-driving features to efficiently manage human cyber risks.
iso 27017 certificate
iso 27018 certificate
iso 27001 certificate
ukas 20382 certificate
Cylon certificate
Crown certificate
Gartner certificate
Tech Nation certificate