Keepnet Labs Logo
Menu
HOME > blog > what is threat modeling

What Is Threat Modeling?

Discover the power of threat modeling to identify vulnerabilities, mitigate cyber risks, and build stronger defenses. Learn the 5 steps, explore popular methodologies like STRIDE and PASTA, and implement best practices to secure your organization against modern threats.

What Is Threat Modeling?

In 2025, the rise of sophisticated cyberattacks has made threat modeling more essential than ever. From phishing attacks to ransomware campaigns, organizations face an array of security challenges that demand proactive solutions. Threat modeling helps you stay ahead of attackers by identifying vulnerabilities in your systems and implementing defenses before a breach occurs.

This approach isn’t just about reacting to attacks but preventing them altogether. By understanding how attackers think, you can build security directly into your systems.

Let’s dive into threat modeling, explore why it’s significant, and learn how your organization can implement it effectively to protect against modern cyber threats.

What is Threat Modeling?

At its core, threat modeling is a structured approach used in designing for security by identifying, assessing, and addressing potential vulnerabilities in a system. This method helps to predict potential security threats, understand their impacts, and develop effective strategies to prevent or mitigate them.

A good threat modeling example might involve assessing vulnerabilities in a company’s online platform before a new feature launch, thereby ensuring that security risks are managed upfront. Threat modeling can also complement other defensive strategies, like improving email security against threats like phishing.

Why Is Threat Modeling Necessary?

The growing complexity of cyber threats makes threat modeling a vital part of any organization’s security strategy. A proactive approach is critical for identifying potential weaknesses before they are exploited. Threat modeling offers organizations a chance to enhance their cybersecurity risk management by building secure systems from the ground up rather than reacting to incidents after they occur.

CategoryDetailsImpactExample Scenario
Risk IdentificationHelps proactively identify threats, vulnerabilities, and attack vectors before exploitation.Reduces likelihood of security incidents.Identifying lack of authentication in an API endpoint.
PrioritizationAllows teams to focus on the most critical threats based on business impact and exploitability.Ensures limited resources are used efficiently.Ranking a SQL injection vulnerability higher than low-severity log exposure.
Secure DesignEmbeds security considerations in the design phase, reducing costly late-stage fixes.Lowers development costs and boosts product resilience.Designing an authentication workflow resistant to session hijacking.
CommunicationFacilitates collaboration between developers, security teams, and stakeholders.Aligns security goals with business and technical objectives.Using DFDs and STRIDE models in cross-functional security planning meetings.
ComplianceHelps meet regulatory and industry standards (e.g., ISO, NIST, GDPR).Avoids legal and financial penalties.Demonstrating secure data handling for GDPR data flow audits.
Continuous SecuritySupports iterative improvement as systems evolve and new threats emerge.Enables dynamic defense in depth.Updating threat models to address emerging threats like AI-powered phishing attacks.
Cost EfficiencyPrevents rework by integrating security early rather than post-breach remediation.Saves on incident response, breach costs, and brand damage.Avoiding redesign of a payment gateway due to early identification of data leakage.
Awareness BuildingEducates teams about the threat landscape relevant to their systems.Increases the security mindset and promotes shared responsibility.Training developers on secure coding through threat model workshops.

Table 1: Why Is Threat Modeling Necessary?

By incorporating frameworks like STRIDE and PASTA into their processes, companies can anticipate risks tied to evolving attack methods such as vishing and ransomware. For example, ransomware attacks like the Petya ransomware or the Conti ransomware have highlighted how unprepared systems can become prime targets.

What Are the Main Objectives of Threat Modeling in Cyber Security?

The Main Objectives of Threat Modelling in cybersecurity .jpg
Picture 1: The Main Objectives of Threat Modelling in cybersecurity

The primary goal of threat modeling is to help organizations preemptively defend against attacks by:

  1. Identifying system vulnerabilities.
  2. Assessing the potential impact of each threat.
  3. Prioritizing threats based on risk and likelihood.
  4. Suggesting mitigation strategies that reduce risks.
  5. Ensuring compliance with security standards.

Whether preparing for a social engineering attack or responding to a phishing incident, the benefits of threat modeling are wide-ranging and significant in the current age. You can further explore the importance of security awareness in preparing your team for these threats.

What Are the 5 Steps of Threat Modeling?

Threat modeling is generally conducted in five key steps to effectively identify, assess, and mitigate potential threats. This structured approach helps organizations gain a clearer understanding of their security posture and prioritize their efforts based on the most significant risks.

By systematically analyzing potential attack vectors and vulnerabilities, teams can implement targeted strategies to enhance their overall security framework and protect sensitive data.

In the following sections, we will explore each step in detail, outlining specific techniques and considerations for effective threat modeling.

Identifying Security Objectives

Understanding what you want to protect and the consequences of a breach is critical. This might include protecting customer data and intellectual property or ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR. This stage is essential in the broader framework of cybersecurity awareness training, which emphasizes preemptive defense.

Application Overview and Threat Profiling

Here, businesses break down their application into smaller components to understand its architecture and possible interaction points where vulnerabilities could be exploited. This step helps create a comprehensive threat profile. Identifying how smishing or quishing attacks might exploit weaknesses in mobile apps or QR code systems is key to developing the right protections.

Threat Identification Techniques

In this stage, organizations identify potential threats and attack vectors using tools like STRIDE, PASTA, or other threat modeling frameworks. For instance, ransomware threats or phishing attempts are frequently analyzed here to understand how they could affect the system. Incorporating advanced analysis of evolving phishing trends or phishing email examples can provide critical insights during this step.

Threat Mitigation Strategies

Once the threats are identified, teams create strategies to mitigate or eliminate these risks. These mitigation strategies are tailored to the nature of each identified threat, such as adding Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) to counteract phishing attacks. Implementing strong defenses against email security threats is particularly significant in today's landscape.

Validation and Security Testing Methods

Finally, validating the security measures and testing them against potential threats is essential. This might involve simulating cyberattacks like penetration testing to ensure the effectiveness of the chosen defenses. By continuously updating your cyber safety rules, you ensure the most effective practices are in place.

What Are the Benefits of Threat Modeling?

The benefits of implementing threat modeling into your cybersecurity strategy are immense:

The Benefits of Threat Modelling .jpg
Picture 2: The Benefits of Threat Modelling
  • Proactive Defense: It allows you to prevent attacks rather than reacting to them.
  • Cost Efficiency: It’s more cost-effective to fix vulnerabilities during the design phase than after a breach occurs.
  • Improved Communication: Encourages collaboration between development, security, and IT teams by creating a common understanding of risks.
  • Enhanced Security Posture: Regular threat modeling helps organizations stay ahead of the ever-evolving cyber threats, such as vishing and smishing.
  • Compliance Assurance: Threat modeling ensures that security measures align with compliance standards like PCI DSS or HIPAA. For instance, ensuring privacy across wireless networks is vital in complying with data protection regulations.

There are several threat modeling frameworks to choose from, depending on your organization's needs. Each has unique advantages, but all aim to systematically address potential threats.

STRIDE Methodology

STRIDE, developed by Microsoft, is one of the most popular frameworks for threat modeling designing for security. It focuses on six categories of threats: Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service (DoS), and Elevation of Privilege. By categorizing threats, STRIDE helps teams better anticipate attacks and create mitigation strategies.

Learn more about how STRIDE threat modeling defends against phishing attacks and other critical threats in today’s landscape.

PASTA

The Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis (PASTA) is a risk-centric methodology that focuses on business objectives. By simulating potential attacks, PASTA helps organizations understand both the technical and business impact of a threat. This approach is particularly useful for analyzing attacks like ransomware or social engineering schemes, which can have devastating financial and reputational impacts.

Trike Framework

The Trike framework stands out as a specialized threat modeling approach that prioritizes risk management at its core. Designed to enable teams to effectively assess and manage the risks associated with their systems, Trike facilitates a structured analysis of potential security threats by systematically assigning risk levels to each component within a system.

This methodical approach ensures that all elements, from software to hardware, are evaluated under a uniform risk assessment criterion, thereby identifying vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

Trike’s integration with human risk management practices is particularly noteworthy. It aligns the technical aspects of threat modeling with the human elements, such as employee behavior and decision-making processes.

This integration is critical for addressing and mitigating the risks posed by social engineering attacks, which exploit human factors rather than technical vulnerabilities.

By assessing how human interactions with systems can lead to security breaches, Trike helps organizations develop more robust defenses against these insidious threats.

Moreover, the Trike framework promotes a proactive stance on risk management. It not only identifies and evaluates threats but also prioritizes them based on their risk levels, guiding teams to allocate resources and implement security measures most effectively.

This strategic approach to threat modeling ensures that organizations can anticipate potential security challenges and fortify their defenses accordingly, making it an invaluable tool in the arsenal of any security-aware organization.

VAST

The VAST modeling framework, which stands for Visual, Agile, and Simple Threat, is meticulously designed to enhance security practices in both software development and operational environments. This framework excels in its scalability and integration within agile methodologies, making it an indispensable tool for teams aiming to embed security within their rapid development cycles.

VAST sets itself apart by providing a visual approach to threat modeling, which simplifies the complex landscapes of security threats into understandable and actionable insights.

This visualization aids in the clear communication of potential security vulnerabilities to all stakeholders involved, from developers to business leaders, ensuring that security considerations are made transparent and accessible throughout the project lifecycle.

Moreover, VAST emphasizes agility, allowing teams to quickly adapt to new threats and changes in the project scope without compromising the integrity of the security posture.

This agile capability ensures that security processes keep pace with the iterative updates and refinements typical in modern development practices.

In addition to its focus on application security, VAST extends its reach to operational security, addressing threats that emerge not just from software vulnerabilities but also from operational practices.

By covering these two critical aspects, VAST provides a comprehensive framework that supports a proactive approach to security, which is significant for mitigating risks in today’s dynamic technology environments.

By integrating VAST into their security strategy, organizations can foster a security culture that aligns with the principles of agile development, ensuring that every sprint and release enhances not only functionality but also the security of the systems.

Best Practices for Implementing Threat Modeling

To effectively implement threat modeling, follow these best practices:

  • Integrate Early: Incorporate threat modeling in the early stages of system design. This ensures vulnerabilities are addressed before they become critical issues. Implementing MFA phishing simulations early on, for example, helps ensure that digital defenses are thoroughly tested.
  • Use Multiple Frameworks: Combine different threat modeling frameworks for more comprehensive coverage of potential risks.
  • Automate When Possible: Utilize automation tools to streamline the threat identification and validation process, particularly in complex systems.
  • Continuously Update Models: Regularly update your threat models to account for new threats, such as emerging ransomware or smishing techniques. Always stay ahead of evolving phishing tactics, as seen in voice phishing and callback phishing trends.
  • Educate Your Team: Ensure that all team members are trained in threat modeling methodologies and understand their role in mitigating threats.

Boost Your Threat Modelling with Keepnet’s Human Risk Management Platform

Wondering how to get started with a comprehensive threat assessment? Keepnet’s Human Risk Management Platform is designed to help you evaluate and mitigate risks across your organization. Using advanced tools like phishing tests, vishing tests, QR code phishing tests, and MFA phishing tests, our platform tests and empowers your team to recognize and respond to various cyber threats.

Our suite of testing tools allows you to simulate real-world attacks, assess vulnerabilities, and measure how prepared your organization is for various types of cyberattacks.

For example, phishing simulations can identify how well your employees can detect malicious emails, while vishing tests simulate voice-based social engineering to expose weak points in phone-based security.

But that's not all. Our platform offers continuous monitoring, detailed reporting, and actionable insights that help you improve your cybersecurity posture over time. Our experts can work closely with you to assess your email vulnerabilities and identify gaps in your current defenses against soft threats like email spoofing, credential harvesting, and social engineering attacks.

SHARE ON

twitter
linkedin
facebook

Schedule your 30-minute private demo now.

You'll learn how to:
tickEvaluate the human element of your security with targeted phishing simulations
tickIdentify and resolve vulnerabilities in your email security
tickAccess comprehensive reports to enhance your overall security posture against threats

Frequently Asked Questions

What Exactly Is Threat Modeling in Cybersecurity?

arrow down

Threat modeling is a structured methodology used by security teams to systematically identify, analyze, and address potential security threats in software or IT infrastructure. It involves visualizing system architectures, defining potential attackers and their objectives, identifying specific vulnerabilities, and outlining practical mitigations.

Why Do Organizations Need Threat Modeling Specifically in Software Development?

arrow down

Organizations use threat modeling during software development to proactively identify security weaknesses early—before deployment. This allows developers to fix vulnerabilities cheaply and efficiently, preventing costly security breaches and regulatory fines later in the software lifecycle.

What Are the Precise Steps Involved in a Typical Threat Modeling Process?

arrow down

A well-defined threat modeling process involves:

4. How Does the STRIDE Framework Specifically Help Identify Threats?

STRIDE is an acronym representing specific categories of threats:

Security teams use these categories to methodically evaluate each system component for vulnerabilities.

  • Asset Identification: Clearly define what you’re protecting (data, applications, infrastructure).
  • System Mapping: Create detailed data flow diagrams showing how data moves through components.
  • Threat Enumeration: Apply frameworks (like STRIDE) to systematically identify specific threats.
  • Assessment: Evaluate threats based on detailed factors (e.g., CVSS or DREAD scoring).
  • Mitigation Planning: Define precise security controls to mitigate or eliminate each identified threat.
  • Documentation and Continuous Review: Maintain and regularly update the threat model documentation.
  • Spoofing (impersonating users),
  • Tampering (unauthorized data modification),
  • Repudiation (ability to deny actions),
  • Information Disclosure (leaking sensitive data),
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (disrupting service availability),
  • Elevation of Privilege (gaining unauthorized access levels).

Can You Give a Real-World Example of Threat Modeling?

arrow down

For example, an e-commerce website threat modeling scenario might include identifying a threat such as “Attackers exploiting a weak authentication mechanism (Elevation of Privilege)” or “Attackers capturing sensitive payment information in transit (Information Disclosure).” The model would then outline precise mitigations, like implementing two-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption.

When Should Threat Modeling Be Done Precisely Within a Project Timeline?

arrow down

Threat modeling should be explicitly conducted at key stages:

  • Design Phase (to anticipate and mitigate issues early),
  • Before Major Releases or System Changes (to ensure no new vulnerabilities),
  • After Major Security Incidents (to ensure vulnerabilities are identified and remediated).

Who Precisely Should Participate in Threat Modeling Sessions?

arrow down

Key participants include software developers (who understand code specifics), cybersecurity specialists (who understand threat landscapes), system architects (who understand system components), product owners (who define business impact), and QA teams (who ensure identified threats are tested and mitigations verified).

Which Tools Specifically Aid in Conducting Detailed Threat Modeling?

arrow down

Popular tools include:

  • Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool (visual mapping of threats and data flows),
  • ThreatModeler (automation and integration with CI/CD pipelines),
  • OWASP Threat Dragon (open-source, collaborative visual threat modeling),
  • PyTM (Python-based, automated threat modeling).

How Does Threat Modeling Specifically Improve Compliance with Regulations?

arrow down

By identifying and explicitly documenting how threats are mitigated, threat modeling directly supports compliance with data protection and privacy standards like GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and ISO 27001, ensuring clear evidence of due diligence in risk management.

Can Threat Modeling Be Applied Specifically to Cloud Environments Like AWS or Azure?

arrow down

Yes. Threat modeling in cloud scenarios explicitly involves analyzing cloud-specific threats such as insecure configurations, overly permissive IAM policies, data leakage from misconfigured S3 buckets (AWS), or exposed blob storage (Azure). This requires understanding specific cloud architecture nuances.

How Often Should You Precisely Update Your Threat Model?

arrow down

A threat model should be specifically updated whenever there is a significant change such as introducing new software features, adding third-party integrations, changing infrastructure, or following new threat intelligence. Regular reviews (e.g., quarterly or semi-annually) are also recommended for ongoing effectiveness.

What Specifically Is an Attack Tree and How Is It Used in Threat Modeling?

arrow down

An attack tree visually maps detailed pathways an attacker might use to exploit system vulnerabilities. Each branch represents a distinct step an attacker could take (e.g., “Steal Admin Credentials” → “Access Database” → “Extract Sensitive Data”). Teams use attack trees to methodically assess risk and prioritize defense mechanisms based on realistic attack scenarios.

What Criteria Should Be Specifically Used to Prioritize Identified Threats?

arrow down

Threat prioritization typically employs specific criteria:

Frameworks like CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) or DREAD precisely quantify these factors.

  • Impact (how severe would an attack be?),
  • Exploitability (how easy is it to exploit?),
  • Likelihood (probability of occurrence),
  • Discoverability (ease of finding the vulnerability).

Can Threat Modeling Specifically Reduce Security Costs? How?

arrow down

Yes, threat modeling significantly reduces long-term security costs. By proactively identifying threats early in development rather than reacting post-deployment, businesses avoid costly incident responses, minimize downtime, and lower expenses related to patching, compliance violations, and legal issues.

What Common Mistakes Should Be Explicitly Avoided During Threat Modeling?

arrow down

Typical mistakes include:

  • Failing to define clear system boundaries (leading to overlooked threats),
  • Over-generalizing threats (ignoring detailed attack vectors),
  • Omitting key stakeholders (missing vital threat insights),
  • Using outdated models (failing to adjust to new threats),
  • Treating threat modeling as a one-time event rather than an iterative, ongoing practice.